Gap analysis
- Meeting with the client's team to understand their current operations and needs.
- Review client documents and processes to address gaps against the ISO/IEC 42001 standard.

As Artificial Intelligence (AI) continues to transform various industries and operations, it brings along important ethical, privacy and security challenges. To address these concerns, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) have established ISO/IEC 42001, a groundbreaking standard specifically designed for Artificial Intelligence Management Systems (AIMS).
Introduced in December 2023, ISO/IEC 42001 provides a comprehensive management framework for responsible AI governance. This standard emphasizes the importance of ethical considerations in AI development and deployment, ensuring that practices are not only effective but also transparent and secure.
ISO/IEC 42001 guides organizations in effectively managing the risks and opportunities associated with AI technologies, fostering a culture of accountability and responsibility. By adhering to this standard, organizations can navigate the complexities of AI while promoting ethical practices and building trust with stakeholders.
Strategies for addressing your organization’s critical AI challenges, enabling ethical, secure and compliant AI deployment while building stakeholder trust.

AI systems can inherit biases from training data, leading to unfair or discriminatory outcomes that damage reputation and trust.
Many AI models operate as “black boxes,” making decisions hard to interpret and explain to stakeholders or regulators.
AI systems may fail unpredictably, especially in high-stakes areas like healthcare or autonomous driving.

AI is designed for enhancing human capabilities but not replacing human judgment, especially in critical decision-making. Ultimately, humans are accountable for the outcomes. Example: Staff recruitment process: AI can help to screen the resume of the candidates but the final decisions should always be made by human recruiters.
AI user should always keep eyes on identifying and reducing biases in AI systems to prevent discriminatory outcomes. Example: Regular audit of AI loan assessment system should be carried out to ensure the result is fair.
The AI applications involving automated decision-making should provide a clear explanation of the result in understandable terms. Example: If a credit application was rejected by AI system, a clear explanation of the rejected reason should be issued to the applicant.
Use of AI applications must comply with the security policies to ensure the confidentiality, integrity and availability of the information. Example: In order to prevent any confidential information leakage, all staff should observe the "Acceptable Use Policy of AI" when submitting any information to an AI texting engine.
AI systems must be robust, reliable, and safe for their intended purposes, minimizing risks associated with their use. Example: AI-driven autonomous driving must undergo rigorous testing to ensure it can safely navigate various driving conditions.
Use of AI must comply with the requirements of laws, regulations, and industry standards. Example: An AI tool used for customer data analysis must comply with the obliged to privacy laws.

Systematically identify and address AI risks to minimize the impact on your businesses or customers.
Build confidence among customers, partners, and regulators in your AI applications
Differentiate your organization as a leader in responsible AI implementation
Position your organization to adapt quickly to evolving AI regulations worldwide
Gap analysis
Policy & Documentation Development
Establish the policies and procedures and necessary documents to align with ISO 42001 requirements.
Implementation & Training
Certification Achievement
For further information on ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Consultancy Process, Please fill the below enquiry form, we will contact you as soon as possible.